I was mulling over the Bruce Jenner situation – you know, the decathlete who now ‘identifies as a woman’ – and the Rachel A. Dolezal story, the white woman who ‘identifies’ as black.
When I was younger my friends and I used expressions like “I hear you” or “I can relate to that.” When we said this we merely meant “I understand what you are saying” or “As I listen to you I can feel something of what you are feeling.” As we moved into the modern (or postmodern) era we began to hear phrases like “I identify with that.” But now we’re into a whole new way of thinking; now instead of saying “I identify with that,” people are claiming “I identify as that,” meaning that – in their minds – they actually are what they believe themselves to be, despite all evidence to the contrary. Wow, we’ve come a long way!
As our culture moves from an overall belief in objective truth to believe in truth claims that are relative to time, place or person (I know, that’s a contradiction in terms, but that’s the way they talk), we should not be surprised by these kinds of expressions. But is this kind of language really so new?
Think back to the garden. What were the words of the serpent when he tempted Eve? “…you will be like God.” Does that sound familiar? If we did a translation in modern English it might read “you will identify as God.”
Maybe this concept is not so new after all.
- Who Should Be Baptized? - April 18, 2022
- Step By Step - June 17, 2019
- We’re Not in Kansas Anymore - November 28, 2016